ABSTRACT
Despite progress on the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals, significant public health challenges remain to address communicable and non-communicable diseases and health inequities. The Healthier Societies for Healthy Populations initiative convened by WHO's Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research; the Government of Sweden; and the Wellcome Trust aims to address these complex challenges. One starting point is to build understanding of the characteristics of successful government-led interventions to support healthier populations. To this end, this project explored five purposefully sampled, successful public health initiatives: front-of-package warnings on food labels containing high sugar, sodium or saturated fat (Chile); healthy food initiatives (trans fats, calorie labelling, cap on beverage size; New York); the alcohol sales and transport ban during COVID-19 (South Africa); the Vision Zero road safety initiative (Sweden) and establishment of the Thai Health Promotion Foundation. For each initiative a qualitative, semistructured one-on-one interview with a key leader was conducted, supplemented by a rapid literature scan with input from an information specialist. Thematic analysis of the five interviews and 169 relevant studies across the five examples identified facilitators of success including political leadership, public education, multifaceted approaches, stable funding and planning for opposition. Barriers included industry opposition, the complex nature of public health challenges and poor interagency and multisector co-ordination. Further examples building on this global portfolio will deepen understanding of success factors or failures over time in this critical area.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Government , Health Status , Chile , Dietary SupplementsABSTRACT
Understanding the spread of SARS-CoV-2, how and when evidence emerged, and the timing of local, national, regional, and global responses is essential to establish how an outbreak became a pandemic and to prepare for future health threats. With that aim, the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response has developed a chronology of events, actions, and recommendations, from December, 2019, when the first cases of COVID-19 were identified in China, to the end of March, 2020, by which time the outbreak had spread extensively worldwide and had been characterised as a pandemic. Datapoints are based on two literature reviews, WHO documents and correspondence, submissions to the Panel, and an expert verification process. The retrospective analysis of the chronology shows a dedicated initial response by WHO and some national governments, but also aspects of the response that could have been quicker, including outbreak notifications under the International Health Regulations (IHR), presumption and confirmation of human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2, declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, and, most importantly, the public health response of many national governments. The chronology also shows that some countries, largely those with previous experience with similar outbreaks, reacted quickly, even ahead of WHO alerts, and were more successful in initially containing the virus. Mapping actions against IHR obligations, the chronology shows where efficiency and accountability could be improved at local, national, and international levels to more quickly alert and contain health threats in the future. In particular, these improvements include necessary reforms to international law and governance for pandemic preparedness and response, including the IHR and a potential framework convention on pandemic preparedness and response.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Animals , COVID-19/transmission , China/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Global Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Information Dissemination , International Cooperation , International Health Regulations , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Time Factors , World Health Organization , Zoonoses/virologySubject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Public Health , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Health Inequities , Health Policy , Humans , Masks , Physical Distancing , Politics , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors , Travel , UncertaintySubject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Communication , Community Participation , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Female , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Human Rights/ethics , Humans , Organizational Objectives , Population Surveillance/methods , Psychosocial Support Systems , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sexual and Gender Minorities/psychologySubject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Economic Status/trends , Female , Health Resources/supply & distribution , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Peer Review/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Singapore/epidemiology , Vaccines/supply & distributionSubject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cytidine/analogs & derivatives , Cytidine/therapeutic use , Global Health , Health Policy , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Hydroxylamines/therapeutic use , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2 , World Health OrganizationSubject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Information Dissemination/methods , Resilience, Psychological/physiology , Trust/psychology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , Communication , Community Participation , Female , Humans , Investments , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/psychologyABSTRACT
Health systems resilience is key to learning lessons from country responses to crises such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this perspective, we review COVID-19 responses in 28 countries using a new health systems resilience framework. Through a combination of literature review, national government submissions and interviews with experts, we conducted a comparative analysis of national responses. We report on domains addressing governance and financing, health workforce, medical products and technologies, public health functions, health service delivery and community engagement to prevent and mitigate the spread of COVID-19. We then synthesize four salient elements that underlie highly effective national responses and offer recommendations toward strengthening health systems resilience globally.